Kentico Kontent vs. Contentful.
If youʼre in the market for a headless CMS, thereʼs a good chance youʼve come across Kentico Kontent and Contentful. While both solutions offer many benefits to enterprises, there are some key differences you should be aware of.
This page will help you understand those differences so youʼre better prepared to decide which solution is the right content management system for your business.
Why companies choose Kontent over Contentful
Unlimited Content Types
Create as many content types as you need across departments, regions, and initiatives without being forced to upgrade.
World-class onboarding and professional services
Average first response time lower than 60 seconds
In-context authoring & collaboration
Collaborate in real-time with contextual Comments, Suggestions, and Simultaneous Editing
Hierarchical content Collections
Optimize content operations across departments and regions
Direct support for Web channel
Without losing the flexibility and agility of a headless CMS
What makes Kontent unique
Content editors can simultaneously work on creating meaningful content for their audiences.
Developers have the freedom to focus on what they do best—creating great apps with the latest technologies.
Project managers can divide their projects into smaller parts managed by different teams or departments, and they benefit from structured (reuse-ready) content.
Content management
Content Modeling
Unlimited Content Types
Roles & Permissions
Single Sign On (SSO)
Multifactor Authentication (MFA)
Collections
Content Collaboration
Simultaneous Editing
Task Management
Localization
Workflows
Website Optimization
In-Context Editing
Development
Multiple Environments
Webhooks
Management API
Image API
Extensions
SDKs
CLI Framework
Dedicated Infrastructure
“Our website has shifted from being a series of pages into a full-blown digital product. This is where Kentico Kontent and Gatsby have really been important. Without that combination, we wouldn’t be able to think about customer experiences the way we have, we wouldn’t be as nimble, and it would be much harder to really improve customer outcomes.”
